Chiswick House and Gardens

I went during the week for a visit, and it was a nice day out in sunny London. The grounds are magnificent to wander around and have a lot of interesting things to see, including the birds on the long, narrow river.

The house itself has a lot of history and was built as a pleasure palace, but for me it felt oddly constructed. For one adult, you’re paying £13.50, which isn’t that cheap, but then the house needs well over a million pounds to keep itself running each year. The day I turned up, there weren’t many people around. In fact, it felt like there were more staff than visitors.

With your ticket, you’re given a little sound box to listen to the history of the house. You can point and zap at objects to listen to. You’re introduced to a fair amount of information. Will you be able to absorb it, or will it all be in one ear and out the other?

The blue room

Many of the paintings felt too new, as if they didn’t have any age to them. The rooms felt impressive and large, but functional? The whole place felt off for me. Maybe it’s the Feng shui in me.

When I left the house, I surprisingly felt more comfortable in the gardens. I first walked round to see the sad old dilapidated greenhouse. I felt sorry for it, then I went to the café to have a bite to eat. Maybe I would have been better off bringing my own lunch! What I chose from the hot menu was, let’s just say, a McDonald’s burger could have tasted better!

Greenhouse
And the greenhouse sad state.

As I had driven here, I decided to make my way round. I tried to extend my car-parking stay for an extra half an hour, only for the phone app to charge me double! I enjoyed the walk through the gardens, along the river, into the wooded area and back up before leaving.

One thing I didn’t do was visit the kitchen garden. I may have missed out there.

All in all, not a bad place. You can visit the gardens for free, so it’s good for the locals. If they want more people, they really need to advertise better.

I recommend a visit to this place.

Please add me… but who are you?

My mobile is doing its security thing by not allowing phone numbers to dial through and then I get a message “please add me” I listen; hear a female voice “Please add me on WhatsApp”.

I’m like, why? What’s your name? Who are you? Where are you from? And most notable, what do you want? You want me to add you, but haven’t introduced yourself?

I ask these questions to myself and wondered at first, wrong number? So, I just ignored the first two messages. However, when it’s happening multiple times, yep, it’s a scam. And now I think about it, it’s the stupidest scam ever! Because these scammers don’t give any indication of importance or any inkling to reply. As you can see from my voice mail above. It’s repetitive! 

I can only suggest to people who also get these, ignore and block.

Supergirl 2026 film review

When the film opened, I felt the very first scene of Krypto the dog peeing was just… stupid! This set off the rest of the film for me, with what I would call immature filmmaking.

And a woman who might not know she can get drunk, early in her youth, finds out she can get drunk under a red sun? But is this film truly about Supergirl, or is it a vengeance film with womanhood and female power at its core? Because we are introduced to Ruthye, whose parents and brother were murdered by a space pirate called Krem, which sets off a chain of events.

One event even goes as far as poisoning Krypto the dog, and this binds Kara with Ruthye on their path.

There are moments when Clark contacts Kara during the movie and, well… I wasn’t a fan of the actor David Corenswet, who played Superman in the previous film. His cameo here just doesn’t have the on-screen chemistry that I feel is required for Superman. There is a certain aura which Superman needs, and he really doesn’t possess it.

However, Milly Alcock’s casting as Kara doesn’t bother me. She has a certain degree of presence which can fit the role. However, the stylised direction from director Craig Gillespie makes some parts feel all over the place.

There was the moment when she was in space, taking apart the female pirates. I rather liked that scene; it was one of the few parts of the film which felt clever and thought-out.

Another directional aspect was the use of the Kryptonian language. I honestly didn’t see the need or point of this. It was meaningless and, at the same time, took away the actors’ ability to perform, leaving the moments feeling wooden.

There is also a problem with rhythm and flow throughout the film, but it has its moments. Overall, it’s watchable, but nothing really stood out or impressed me.

One final thought, I really don’t want to give the final of the film away, however, there is a moral question: would Otto Binder, the creator of Supergirl, have liked the fact that Gillespie broke that moral code? I feel there is a question here, and a wound that cannot be healed now.

2.5 out of 5.

The failure of the toy guns

A while back I tried to list some toy cap guns on eBay, only for eBay to remove them and say they were against their policy because they are replicas.

Really? These tiny little guns? Replicas? They are just kids’ toy cap guns, about 40 years old. However, I was beaten by eBay!

The same policy issue can apparently happen with charity shops, so I don’t think I can even donate them.

So, I decided to take them down to Camden and try the antiques shop. The guy wasn’t interested, nor were the other retro games shops. So, I’m completely busted out.

I am wondering if they are actually sellable or not. And sadly, during my adventures, one of them broke.

My last options are that someone might make an offer in the comments section, or I will eventually just throw them in the bin!

If anyone knows whether these old toy cap guns are actually sellable, let me know.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day film review

This action-packed film is well made, well written and has lots of emotion. I actually felt sad watching this in parts, almost having tears in my eyes. But I enjoyed most of the movie.

After the events of the last movie, where Dr Strange erases Peter Parker’s memory from everyone, everyone has forgotten who Peter is, but everyone still remembers who Spider-Man is. This changes the dynamic between old friends, and the film feels very much about re-establishing those friendships.

From the other side of the spectrum, you have Jean Grey, who is normally a hero. She starts off as the bad guy, but is she really an anti-hero? Jean’s powers are off the chart. She is able to control people, and that is dangerous. But at the same time, I found this to be a violation of nature. So, I was in two minds about her.

While watching the film, I learned about one aspect of the Marvel universe that I knew nothing about, which is Damage Control. Spider-Man was basically flying around New York, and I actually felt like I was in a computer game. There are aspects that felt very much like the 2018 release of Sony’s Marvel’s Spider-Man game. The jumping, web shooting and the overall style were very similar to that game.

His relationship with Frank Castle also had that rather odd comedy about it. Then you have Bruce Banner, aka The Hulk, who seems to be a shadow of his former self, but is still powerful.

Then there is The Hand, operated by Damage Control, but I don’t know why the storyline feels off here. It’s like I’ve missed something from a previous film or story. I love the style of ninjas in New York, but the storyline itself doesn’t quite seem to fit together properly.

All in all, it’s not a bad film, but not brilliant either. I enjoyed it, and there were some genuinely emotional moments, but some of the story feels as though a few cogs in the machine are missing. There are pieces here that I enjoyed, but I was left wondering whether I had missed something along the way.

4 out of 5.